New Year's Revolution

Yesterday was a tough day for winning NBA teams. Both the Wizards and Knicks beat the Cavs and Celtics respectively, and the Grizz did what the Wolves couldn't do, hold on in the second half and beat the Mavs. Now, since we beat both New York and Memphis, does that mean we're better than the Celtics and Mavs? Of course not. Following a similar line of logic, does the fact we've won two straight against bad teams represent a corner turned?

If you believe that, there's a job in Norm Coleman's Senate office waiting for you. As we keep hearing ad naseum from just about everyone in the NBA, it's a long season. The great teams aren't always going to be great, and the bad clubs...well, they HAVE to play other bad clubs sometime. To their credit, Minnesota beat bad teams missing at least one or more of their core players. For the Warriors, it was Monta Ellis and Corey Maggette. For the Bulls, it was Luol Deng, Kirk Hinrich, and Drew Gooden.

However, you just KNOW what will be spinning for the next couple of week from our favorite broadcast propagandists--Tom Hanneman and Jim Petersen. They'll be talking about all the naysayers who think the franchise is moribund and think Kevin McHale is an idiot. Petersen will in particular talk about how--based on his "inside" access--hard they work day after day, and just how good a teacher McHale really is. They'll talk about the energy and enthusiasm of the club now that they're believing in themselves again, confidence being everything. And, maybe as they did with Mike Miller during his recent injury outage, they'll spend a couple of second quarters talking about pheasant hunting and parenting. As was reported by the Useless Press a few weeks back, Roger Ailes of Fox News is looking for someone to go head to head with Rachel Maddow of MSNBC in the 8pm (Central Time) slot. Petersen, like every other conservative broadcaster alive in the world today, can never admit he's wrong, thus making him the perfect candidate for the position. I'm not sure he'd give up the Lynx assistant coaching gig for that job, but he should get an audition. He'd be perfect in that role.

Which leads me to my New Year's Revolution...maybe the first of many.

Exactly why are all NBA teams paying for television broadcasters?

Given the Wolves meager television ratings, it seems like money poured down a rabbit hole. Last summer, the Olympics had multiple basketball games simulcast, but only the lead game was broadcast by the NBC crew. All the other games had television feeds and real arena atmospherics, no talking heads at all. Simple inserts and pop-ups would give the audience stats, keep the score up-to-date, and should even allow analysis from the fans as well as an "expert", instead of those god-awful, softball, text messages Petersen and Hanneman field night after night (Example: Is Craig Smith too small to play power forward? Petersen: Great question!) It seems to me that in this digital, high definition age innovation should rule the day.

Think about it. A true interactive broadcast, with divergent points of view and little spin. Kind of like Britt's blog and Canis Hoopus, in hi-def. The mind boggles.